Светлана Жарникова – Indo-Europeans cultural traditions (страница 4)
especially, Andronovo pottery. Moreover, in the Caucasus these motives most
likely have the same sacred functions of talisman and possibly of tribal and clan
totem as were characteristic of Andronovo and, likely, Tripolye cultures.
We encounter echoes of swastika motives in Scythian jewelry, more
specifically in the decor of horse trappings recovered from the Northern Pontine
area. A.Meliukova believes that the openwork swastika plaques, also to be
encountered in Thracian hoards are of Scythian origin, and adds that they appeared
in the Northern Pontine area in the late 6th century B.C. True, in Scythian art, all
these forms have been markedly modified and transmuted (Fig. 47) to meet
requirements of the conventionalized realistic trend known as the Scytho-Siberian
Animal Style.
We would now like to turn to the Vologda material. The appended table
furnishes specimens of the traditional ornamental motives of peasant embroideries
and ornamental weaving, common in the North-Eastern districts of Vologda
region. We noted earlier what the historical and ethnic situation in these parts was
like and we have no reason to question the Slav, or rather, East-Slav, Russian
origin of these ornamental patterns. All the samples supplied are details of
elaborate ornamental patterns that embellished headgear, sashes and belts, aprons,
shirts and blouses and towels, items mostly sacred that beside having a purely
domestic usage were talismans. One must say that the resemblance is amazing. As
in the entire range of the Andronovo decor, in North-Russian embroidery and
ornamental weaving, too the compositions are divided into three horizontal
15
registers with the often repetitive top and bottom two enclosing the central register
that as a rule displays the vital most designs from the angle of semantic
significance. This is precisely where we encounter a diversity of meandr and
swastika motifs (Fig. 51) which are absolutely identical with the Tripolye (Fig.
52) and Amlronovo (Figs. 33 and 34) decor as well as with the North Caucasian
and Trans-Caucasian motifs of the 13th-8th centuries B.C. and Scythian decor
\'7bFig. 41). Thus, if the ornament from the Babader vish site .(Fig. 29) embellished
the wall behind the altar in a 12th-8th centuries B.C. dwelling had an
unquestionably ritual significance the absolutely identical pattern, a composition
of lozenges, which adorns the hem of a North-Russian peasant woman's blouse, is
also of a ritual nature (Fig. 31).
The design on the pintadera from the same site has an affinity with the pattern
of a wedding towel (Fig. 61) and with the design on the stitched inset for a
Vologda towel (Fig. 59). Further, the detail from the ornamental pattern of an
Andronovo vessel (Fig. 18) is almost identical with that of the embroidered hem of
a blouse (Fig. 24), while the embroidered towel end (Fig. 5) is absolutely identical
with the intricate meander weave that embellishes an Andronovo clay vessel of the
middle of the 2nd millennium B.C. (Fig. 4) etc. etc. (see Figs. 19, 20, 22, 23, 25,
30 and 60). The existence of such affinities is likewise confirmed by east Slav
archaeological finds. Thus, the intricate swastika on the clasp or buckle of 1220-
1260 (discovered in the late 1960s at the Tikhvin digs in Novgorod (Fig. 36), is
identical with the motif that the Vologda peasant woman U.Terebova employed in
the 1910s for the wedding towel of her daughter (Fig. 37). Most exciting in this
respect is the slate spindle whorl, carrying a scratched design in the form of a six-
armed Orthodox cross enclosed within spiral meanders and swastikas
published by G. Polyakova (Fig. 42).
The list could be greatly extended. However we shall merely state that while
with different nations similar ornamental patterns may converge, one is hard put to
believe that peoples thousands of kilometers and thousands of years apart could-if
16
they are not ethnogenetically linked-invent quite independendy of one another
such intricate ornamental patterns, which are identical down to the smallest detail
and which, furthermore, discharge the same ritual functions of talisman and totem.
Refraining from far-reaching conclusions, we shall merely note that as our
analysis is restricted to the steppes and forest-steppes of the USSR, we have not
invoked analogous Indian and Persian items, if we did so the appended table of
affinities would be much longer. It is our profound conviction, however that, such
material should be invoked as representing a most serious problem for the science
of history in the foreseeable future. The affinities to be observed in the spiritual
and material cultures of the ancient Slavs and, for instance, of the peoples of North
Western and Western Indian and Iran-both in olden times and partially today-are