Владимир Дубковский – Nectar for Your Soul (страница 22)

It’s all, of course, in the essence and form of the proceedings in Lourdes.

The strong spirit of falseness and commerciality that reigns in the town and sanctuaries of Our Lady of Lourdes is vividly described by the noted French writer Émile Zola (1840—1902) in his novel Lourdes. Naturally, the grand shows constructed in Lourdes and the entire accompanying industry of merchandise and recreation has nothing in common with the Soul’s process of interaction with God, exclusively through which healing is possible. Those who were healed all the same are those who are able to close themselves off from the atmosphere which reigns in Lourdes and come into contact with God. They were only hindered by all these loud rituals, but deep faith and the proper mood during interaction with God turns out to be stronger than all outside interference.

How and in what one must believe, how to properly conduct oneself and pray, so that everything works out according to our desires is clearly written in ancient manuscripts, found in 1945 in Upper Egypt and from 1947 to 1956 in the caves of Qumran in the Judean Desert. These manuscripts, which have been named the “Nag Hammadi library” and the “Dead Sea Scrolls,” are published in the series “Discoveries in the Judean Desert” (DJD) and currently consist of 40 volumes, published since 1955 by the publishing house Oxford University Press.

If the ancient knowledge of these manuscripts is combined with the achievements of quantum physics, which provide their scientific explanation, it results in an extremely beneficial cocktail, which we encourage you to taste in the following chapters of this book.

Chapter 4.

Who do we believe?

Materialist scientists and their mistaken beliefs regarding the origins of the Universe and humanity. How the followers of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution fooled the entire world. The groundlessness of the Big Bang Theory as an explanation of the Universe’s origin. The story of Flatland, the two-dimensional world. Renowned scientists on God and the creation of the Universe. How are discoveries and artistic masterpieces really made? What is quantum physics and how can it help us to change ourselves and influence those close to us? The Divine Matrix. The formula for altering reality.

“Do you believe in God?” – “I don’t believe, I know.”

In the soul of man there is a God-shaped hole,

and everyone fills it as he can.

In our search for the answer to eternal questions of happiness and the meaning of life, we turn to various sources of knowledge, among which the primary ones are scientific, religious and philosophical. Each source has its own belief system, which differs from the others, and each insists that precisely its system is true. The majority of people, unable to grasp this mass of contradictory and mutually exclusive “sources,” fall into skepticism, losing the very possibility of achieving happiness and finding the meaning of their lives. Together with you we are trying to make sense of various sources and gather those things that are able to fill that metaphorical hole that Jean-Paul Sartre referred to.

If one takes a look at sources of knowledge from “geometrical standpoints,” it is possible to divide them into two categories: external and internal.

The internal or earthly source is the thoughts and conclusions of people, based on their own life experience, study of others’ experiences and scientific research. Knowledge from this source is very important; you can’t live a day without it. We receive it first from our parents, then we horde up experience, filling it out through interaction with others and at school and university. The majority of people’s troubles lie in the fact that they limit themselves to this, having scooped out of the ocean of knowledge just a teaspoon. This is like illuminating one’s life path with a small candle while there’s a powerful floodlight right underhand. We’ve already examined what this leads to in detail in the preceding chapters.

However, even the most powerful earthly floodlight can’t highlight the realms of the Immaterial World where our fates are formed and gathered. It is impossible to look into “the Creator’s kitchen” with our own eyes; traditional physical instruments with all the technology of science are ineffective at this task. It is impossible to comprehend the Universe, which is the reflection of the Creator’s conscious, using technical equipment. It’s like trying to measure the depth of love with a slide rule or weigh the strength of anger on apothecary scales.

We live in a three-dimensional physical world, and we can only imagine things in the framework of three dimensions: length, width, and height. But the Immaterial World is multidimensional, and as such it is impossible to look upon it from Earth, whether through radio telescopes or hadron colliders. Failing to understand this, materialist scientists periodically make sensational announcements of their “discoveries,” which fully refute their dogmas of yesterday. But then “tomorrow” comes with the appearance of new “discoveries” which once again fundamentally change the conceptions of scientists.

This is how the understanding of dark energy came about in 1998, when astronomers revealed that the Universe is growing faster than it ought to in accordance with existing theories. It was declared that this unseen dark energy provides around 74% of the Universe’s mass and energy, another 23% is attributed to dark (also mystifying) matter and only 4% is attributable to ordinary matter that can be watched and tracked. Dark energy, a fact of existence known only through its effect on the Universe’s state of being, was named the greatest astronomical mystery.

They didn’t manage to solve this mystery, as a different group of scientists placed in doubt the existence of dark matter as a physical phenomenon. And when, in June 2010, NASA’s Kepler space telescope transmitted images from the depths of space in which scientists made out 100 million planets of our galaxy, 140 of which are similar to Earth, another complete change in existing scientific conceptions regarding the Universe was announced. It was previously thought that beyond the boundaries of our Solar System there existed primarily gaseous planets. It has now emerged that the Universe is full of planets made of hard material.

Scientists made the important announcement that they had at long last uncovered the fate of the Universe, which, in their opinion, will endlessly expand and, in the end of all things, transform into a cold and dead expanse with a temperature close to absolute zero.

Science also knows where the Universe itself came from, and all of us along with it: it turns out that long ago there existed (where, and in what?) a single point with no volume and infinite mass (?!). Then one day, 14 billion years ago, it suddenly exploded, as a result of which the Universe, with its innumerable multitude of stars and galaxies, took shape. It’s that simple; from nothing there arose everything, after which it all somehow organized itself, and in a primeval ocean, under the influence of unknown factors, the molecules of amino acids accidentally took shape. Then, by chance, they formed compounds resembling proteins, after which there accidentally arose a molecule capable of reproducing itself, the first living cell arose of its own accord, and the process moved on. It proceeded so well, that there soon arose simple microorganisms, and after them more complex ones, and so on until apes, which over time transformed into humans. On the whole almost exactly according to Darwin. We say “almost” because Charles Darwin (1809—1882) himself called his idea about the origin of species through natural selection and resultant evolution merely a hypothesis and announced that he was willing to reject it if paleontologists were unable to find intermediary (transitional) forms of living organisms. Paleontologists tried their hardest, but even after several decades of persistent searching the sought-after forms remained unfound. Moreover, excavations presented a wealth of evidence that refutes Darwin’s hypothesis: the fossils that could support evolution through natural means were never found, and all the species appeared completely unrelated from the beginning. However, supporters of the theory of evolution weren’t embarrassed by this and ended up becoming greater Darwinists than Darwin himself. In 1912, completely dismayed by the search for the infamous transitional link between apes and humans, they personally improvised the desired “artifact,” attaching the jaw of an orangutan with teeth of a chimpanzee to a human skull. For a period of forty years evolutionists fooled the scientific world (and the rest of the world as well) with this fake, which has entered history as the Piltdown Man because the place of its “discovery” was reported to be the village of Piltdown in the county of Sussex, Great Britain. At first this fabrication performed an invaluable service for evolutionists, but later, after the exposure of the forgers in 1953, it dealt the theory of evolution a blow from which it couldn’t recover. In the United States, for example, only 12% of the population continues to believe in “Darwin’s theory.” Hundreds of scientists from various countries of the world have expressed their “extreme skepticism” regarding the dogmas of Darwin’s “theory of evolution.” The Discovery Institute, located in Seattle, Washington, USA, has stepped forth as an initiator for the movement to reject Darwinist dogmas.