18+
реклама
18+
Бургер менюБургер меню

Кали Андерссон – Климатическая психология. Как добиться устойчивого развития (страница 46)

18

Dolan, P. & Galizzi, M. M. (2015). Like ripples on a pond: Behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j. joep.2014.12.003

Hall, M. P., Lewis, N. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. (2018). Believing in climate change, but not behaving sustainably: Evidence from a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.03.001

Holmgren, M., Andersson, H. & Sörqvist, P. (2018). Averaging bias in environmental impact estimates: Evidence from the negative footprint illusion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 48–52.

Hounsham, S. (2006). Painting the town green: How to persuade people to be environmentally friendly. Green Engage. http://tinyurl.com/bsrsxq

Kaklamanou, D. m.fl. (2015). Using public transport can make up for flying abroad on holiday: Compensatory green beliefs and environmentally significant behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 184–204.

Kennedy, E. H., Krahn, H. & Krogman, N. T. (2015). Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behavior, and carbon footprint. Local Environment, 20, 220–236. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.837039

Klöckner, C. A., Nayum, A. & Mehmetoglu, M. (2013). Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment, 21, 32–38.

Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260.

Konsumtionsrapporten (2018). Red. J. M. Magnus Roos. Centrum för konsumtionsvetenskap. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/58484

Kormos, C. & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003

Murtagh, N., Gatersleben, B. & Uzzell, D. (2012). Self-identity threat and resistance to change: Evidence from regular travel behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32 (4), 318–326. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.008

Nemcsicsné Zsóka, Á. (2008). Consistency and ”awareness gaps” in the environmental behaviour of Hungarian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (3), 322–329. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.044

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21stcentury economist. London: Random House Business.

Reynolds, L. (2010). The sum of the parts: Can we really reduce carbon emissions through individual behaviour change? Journal of the Royal Society for Promotion of Health, 130 (1), 41–46.

Schmitt, M. T. m.fl. (2018). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003

Szerényi, Z. M. m.fl. (2011). Consumer behaviour and lifestyle patterns of Hungarian students with regard to environmental awareness. Society and Economy, 33, 1, 89–109. doi: 10.1556/SocEc.33.2011.1.8

Sörqvist, P. & Langeborg, L. (2019). Why people harm the environment although they try to treat it well: An evolutionary-cognitive perspective on climate compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 348.

Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206

Thøgersen, J. & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32 (2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10603-0099101-1

Truelove, H. B. m.fl. (2016). From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: An experimental test of pro-environmental spillover. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.004

Wynes, S. & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12 (7). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541

В центре внимания – эффективность

Dietz, T. m.fl. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 106 (44) 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106

Wynes, S. & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12 (7). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541

Lagändring om utsläppsrätter: https://www.dn.se/debatt/nu-kan- lokalt-miljoarbete-ge-stora-effekter-aven-globalt/

https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-will-reformed-eu-emissions- trading-system-raise-carbon-prices

Whanghanuifloden: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/2019/04/maori-river-in-new-zealand-is-a-legal-person/

В одиночку слабы, вместе сильны?

Bleys, B. m.fl. (2017). The environmental impact of individual behavior: Self-assessment versus the ecological footprint. Environment and Behavior, 50 (2), 187–212. doi:10.1177/0013916517693046

Centola, D. m.fl. (2018). Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science, 360 (6393), 1116–1119. doi:10.1126/science.aas8827

Crompton, T. & Thøgersen, J. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32 (2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10603-0099101-1

Euliss, N. H. m.fl. (2010). The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environmental Science & Technology, 44 (20): 7761–7763, doi:10.1021/es102761c

Dubois, G. m.fl. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 144–158.

Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W. & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18–26.

Holmberg, J. m.fl. (2010). Klimatomställningen och det goda livet. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.

Killingsworth, M. A. & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). ’A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind’. Science, 330 (6006), 932.

Mont, O. m.fl. (2013). Förbättra nordiskt beslutsfattande genom att skingra myter om hållbar konsumtion. Stockholm: Nordiska ministerrådet.

Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology. 10:e utgåvan. New York: McGraw Hill, 267–276.

The Oxford Handbook of political consumerism (2019). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Statens Energimyndighet (2010). Barns känslor och tankar om klimatproblemen. Eskilstuna: Energimyndigheten.

Jätteräkor: https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/skippa-scampi- certifierad-eller-inte

Konsumentmakt: https://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/nyheter/bananexpert-tror-pa-konsumentmakt

Köttkonsumtion i Sverige: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Sa-mar-miljon/Statistik-A-O/Kottprodukter-konsumtion- per-person/

Veganism i Sverige 2014 och 2017: https://www.djurensratt.se/node/57

Активный гражданин или сознательный потребитель?

Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H. & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 325–374. doi:10.1177/0149206308316059

Ballew, M. T. m.fl. (2019). Climate change activism among latino and white Americans. Frontiers in Communication, 3. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2018.00058

Bamberg, S., Rees, J. & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006

Barr, S. & Prillwitz, J. (2014). A smarter choice? Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmentally sustainable mobility. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1068/c1201

Berg, L. (2012). Gryning över Kalahari – om hur människan blev människa. Stockholm: Ordfront.

Chenoweth, E. & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.

Christens, B. D., Peterson, N. A. & Speer, P. W. (2011). Community participation and psychological empowerment: Testing reciprocal causality using a cross-lagged panel design and latent constructs. Health Education & Behavior, 38 (4), 339–347. doi:10.1177/1090198110372880

Crompton, T. & Thøgersen, J. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32 (2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10603-0099101-1

Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65 (4), 707–725. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2009.01622.x

Feldman, L. & Hart, P. S. (2015). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism. Science Communication, 38 (1), 99–127. doi:10.1177/1075547015617941

Griffin, P. (2017). CDP Carbon Majors Report. The Carbon Majors Database. https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced 550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017. pdf?1499691240