реклама
Бургер менюБургер меню

Андрей Журавлёв – Похождения видов. Вампироноги, паукохвосты и другие переходные формы в эволюции животных (страница 105)

18

Gawryluk R. M. R. et al. (2019) Non-photosynthetic predators are sister group to red algae. Nature, 572, 240–3.

Gibson T. M. et al. (2018) Precise age of Bangiomorpha pubescens dates the origin of eukaryotic photosynthesis. Geology, 46, 135–8.

Hehenberger E. et al. (2019) A kleptoplastidic dinoflagellate and the tipping point between transient and fully integrated plastid endosymbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116, 17934–42.

Imachi H. et al. (2020) Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. Nature, 577, 519–25.

Javaux E. J. (2019) Challenges in evidencing the earliest traces of life. Nature, 572, 451–60.

Javaux E. J., Knoll A. H. (2017) Micropalaeontology of the lower Mesoproterozoic Roper Group, Australia, and implications for early eukaryotic evolution. Journal of Paleontology, 91, 199–229.

Knoll A. H. (2014) Paleobiological perspectives on early eukaryotic evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Perspective Biology, 6, a016121. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016121.

Knoll A. H., Javaux E. J., Hewitt D., Cohen P. (2006) Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361, 1023–38.

Ku C. et al. (2015) Endosymbiotic gene transfer from prokaryotic pangenomes: Inherited chimerism in eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112, 10139–46.

Kurland C. G., Andersson S. G. E. (2000) Origin and evolution of the mitochondrial proteome. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Review, 64, 786–820.

Lahr D. J. G. et al. (2019) Phylogenomics and morphological reconstruction of Arcellinida testate amoebae highlight diversity of microbial eukaryotes in the Neoproterozoic. Current Biology, 29, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.078.

Lane N. (2017) Singular endosymbiosis or singular event at the origin of eukaryotes? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 434, 58–67.

Leonard G. et al. (2018) Comparative genomic analysis of the ‘pseudofungus’ Hyphochytrium catenoides. Open Biology, 8, 170184. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.170184.

López-García P., Moreira D. (2020) The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited. Nature Microbiology, 5, 655–67.

Loron C. C. et al. (2018) Implications of selective predation on the macroevolution of eukaryotes: evidence from Arctic Canada. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 2, 247–55.

Loron C. C. et al. (2019) Early fungi from the Proterozoic era in Arctic Canada. Nature, 570, 232–5.

Marshall C. P., Javaux E. J., Knoll A. H., Walter M. R. (2005) Combined micro-Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy of Proterozoic acritarchs: A new approach to palaeobiology. Precambrian Research, 138, 208–24.

Martin W. F. et al. (2017) The physiology of phagocytosis in the context of mitochondrial origin. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 81, e00008–7. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00008–7.

Melnikov S. et al. (2020) Archaeal ribosomal proteins possess nuclear localization signal-type motifs: Implications for the origin of the cell nucleus. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 37, 124–33.

Moczydłowska M., Landing E., Zang W., Palacios T. (2011) Proterozoic phytoplankton and timing of chlorophyte algae origins. Palaeontology, 54, 721–33.

Pang K. et al. (2013) The nature and origin of nucleus-like intracellular inclusions in Paleoproterozoic eukaryote microfossils. Geobiology, 11, 499–510.

Payne J. L. et al. (2009) Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 24–7.

Porter S. M. (2006) The Proterozoic fossil record of heterotrophic eukaryotes. In Neoproterozoic Geobiology and Paleobiology. Eds. S. Xiao, A. J. Kaufman. Dordrecht: Springer. P. 1–21.

Porter S. (2016) Tiny vampires in ancient seas: evidence for predation via perforation in fossils from 780–740 million-year-old Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, USA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 283, 20160221. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0221.

Roger A. J., Muñoz-Gómez S. A., Kamikawa R. (2017) The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Current Biology, 27, R1177–92.

Sergeev V. N., Knoll A. H., Grotzinger J. P. (1995) Paleobiology of the Mesoproterozoic Billyakh Group, Anabar Uplift, northern Siberia. Journal of Paleontology, 69 (1) II, 1–37.

Sergeev V. N., Knoll A. H., Vorob’eva N. G., Sergeeva N. D. (2016) Microfossils from the lower Mesoproterozoic Kaltasy Formation, East-European Platform. Precambrian Research, 278, 87–107.

Shalchian-Tabrizi K. et al. (2006) Telonemia, a new protist phylum with affinity to chromist lineages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 1833–42.

Strother P. K. Battison L., Brasier M. D., Wellman C. H. (2011) Earth’s earliest non-marine eukaryotes. Nature, 473, 505–9.

Tang Q. et al. (2015) Organic-walled microfossils from the Tonian Gouchou Formation, Huaibei region, North China Craton, and their biostratigraphic implications. Precambrian Research, 266, 296–318.

Vafai S. B., Mootha V. K. (2012) Mitochondrial disorders as windows into an ancient organelle. Nature, 491, 374–83.

Villanueva L. et al. (2021) Bridging the membrane lipid divide: bacteria of the FCB group superphylum have the potential to synthesize archaeal ether lipids. The ISME Journal, 15, 168–82.

Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K. et al. (2016) Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature, 541, 353–8.

Zhu S. et al. (2016) Decimetre-scale multicellular eukaryotes from 1.56-billion-year-old Gaoyuzhuang Formation in North China. Nature Communications, 7, 11500. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11500.

Животовский Б. Д. Программируемая гибель клеток – медицине // Химия и жизнь XXI век. 2014. № 5, 10–5.

Журавлев A. Ю. Ранняя история Metazoa – взгляд палеонтолога // Журнал общей биологии. 2014. Т. 75, № 6. C. 411–65.

Иванцов А. Ю. Новая реконструкция кимбереллы – проблематического вендского многоклеточного животного // Палеонтологический журнал. 2009. № 6. С. 3–12.

Иванцов А. Ю. Следы питания проартикулят – вендских многоклеточных животных // Палеонтологический журнал. 2011. № 3. С. 3–13.

Иванцов А. Ю. Реконструкция Charniodiscus yorgensis (макробиота венда Белого моря) // Палеонтологический журнал. 2016. № 1. С. 3–13.

Наймарк Е. Б., Иванцов А. Ю. Возрастная изменчивость поздневендских проблематик Parvancorina Glaessner // Палеонтологический журнал. 2009. Т. 43, № 1. С. 14–19.

Петрухин В. Я. Русь в IX–X веках. От призвания варягов до выбора веры. – М.: ФОРУМ; Неолит, 2013.

Федонкин М. А. Бесскелетная фауна венда и ее место в эволюции Metazoa. – М.: Наука, 1987. (Тр. ПИН АН СССР. Т. 226.)

Belahbib H. et al. (2018) New genomic data and analyses challenge the traditional vision of animal epithelium evolution. BMC Genomics, 19, 1. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4715-9.

Bobrovskiy I. et al. (2019) Ancient steroids establish the Ediacaran fossil Dickinsonia as one of the earliest animals. Science, 361, 1246–9.

Bonner J. T. (2006) Migration in Dictyostelium polycephalum. Mycologia, 98, 260–4.

Bowyer F., Wood R. A., Poulton S. W. (2017) Controls on the evolution of Ediacaran metazoan ecosystems: A redox perspective. Geobiology, 15, 516–51.

Brasier M. D., Antcliffe J. B. (2008) Dickinsonia from Ediacara: A new look at morphology and body construction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 270, 311–23.

Brasier M. D., Antcliffe J. B. (2009) Evolutionary relationships within the Avalonian Ediacara biota: new insights from laser analysis. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 166, 2, 363–84.

Brock D. A., Douglas T. E., Queller D. C., Strassmann J. E. (2011) Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba. Nature, 469, 393–6.

Brunet T. et al. (2018) Light-regulated collective contractility in a multicellular choanoflagellate. Science, 366, 326–34.

Butterfield N. J. (2020) Constructional and functional anatomy of Ediacaran rangeomorphs. Geological Magazine, First View, 1–12. DOI: 10.1017/S0016756820000734.

Chen L. et al. (2014) Cell differentiation and germ-soma separation in Ediacaran animal-like fossils. Nature, 516, 238–41.

Coutts F. J., Bradshaw C. J. A., García-Bellido D. C., Gehling J. G. (2018) Evidence of sensory-driven behavior in the Ediacaran organism Parvancorina: Implications and autecological interpretations. Gondwana Research, 55, 21–9.

Dong L. et al. (2008) Restudy of the worm-like carbonaceous compression fossils Protoarenicola, Pararenicola, and Sinosabellidites from early Neoproterozoic successions in North China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 258, 138–61.

Droser M. L. et al. (2014) A new Ediacaran fossil with a novel sediment displacive habit. Journal of Paleontology, 88, 145–51.

Droser M. L. et al. (2019) Piecing together the puzzle of the Ediacaran biota: Excavation and reconstruction at the Ediacara National Heritage site Nilpena (South Australia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 513, 132–45.

Dudin O. et al. (2019) A unicellular relative of animals generates a layer of polarized cells by actomyosin-dependent cellularization. eLife, 8, e49801. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.49801.