Алмаз Браев – Socialist. Elitism II (страница 5)

And in Asia, communism in the form of a community of younger brothers could not establish itself. The most obvious example is the flight exit from Afghanistan of a limited contingent of the Soviet Army. Islam opposes communism as a denomination everywhere globally, even in hierarchical Iran, where it might have a chance. On the territory of the former Arab Caliphate of the Ottoman Empire, such “rural communism” had no chance. All the younger brothers in Arab families found their socialism in the Muslim Ummah. If there is a chance of a revival of communism in another environment other than Russia and China, although it seems that Marxism is supposedly triumphant in the PRC, (Nothing like that. In China, a modernized Confucian community under the guise of communism leads the people into the future. Although the people also agree to call their system communist), then Arab communism will be exclusively Muslim. And the Arabs will never agree to call their state communist. The Libyan Jamahiriya collapsed just from tribal squabbles of semi-nomadic elites. The former nomads settled in cities like Benghazi, but that didn’t make them Democrats or socialists. Such elites are generally difficult to define in a civilizational manner. But the imperial idea of dictatorship is constantly being replaced, first by the Russian idea and now by the Chinese version of communism. Communism marches around the world in the form of national-cultural dictatorships. This should already be clear to everyone. Are there any other questions? To put it simply, The majority of the population is used to collective life and dictatorship. If Marxists call these worlds communism, such Marxists will push their people to tragedy in advance. Fidel and Raul Castro (by the way, both younger sons in the Castro clan, that is, innate socialists) proved it. To them, you can add Ernesto Guevara, an Argentine revolutionist. He also denied the dictates of the Moscow bureaucracy. (Che Guevara was his father’s eldest son, as was Mao) That’s why Che and Mao became friends in absentia. Nowhere in Marx is it written that the peasantry can be progressive. But the Chinese leader wrote that the peasantry could “encircle the cities,” and the Argentine thought that a handful of fighters would stir up a revolution in Bolivia. There is one but. If Che had won, he would have revolutionized Argentina, and the Castro brothers would have been his comrades. Then, by analogy with the tragedy of Bolshevism in Russia, he would have had to repress his brothers. He was the eldest son. Fighting against the Peron regime, he fled to Mexico, then ended up in Cuba, in a foreign land. He no longer wanted to grow old in Cuba and turn into a pot-bellied bureaucrat. So, he went away young and holy. This saved him from a showdown with the Castro brothers.

So, the imperial totality cannot live in a small republic or on an island except as an idea. Ideologically, in the same Cuba, they could recognize the communist idea, but they could not translate it into a harsh dictatorship. There are enough showdowns of warring factions to call for discipline in a small country: enough authority and charisma of one man. When Castro went to the Camaguey barracks unguarded against the Catholics of Comandante Matos (Trotsky also took the Peter and Paul Fortress garrison without firing near the time of the October Revolution. Stalin’s police officers could not bring him to Alma – Ata in January 1928 because of his great authority. Stalin went to the deception. They announced the postponement of the time of the train departure).

A large territory requires tough power all the time. Otherwise, the empire will fall apart. But this rigidity constantly grows when the idea is insufficient, and all the older sons inevitably grow old and become executive bureaucrats. The socialism of the younger sons is always inferior to the traditional discipline of the empire. Socialism is actually a convention of each historical case. There are different names for the emerging new dictatorship. It will be there again, or the empire will break into small islands.

Chapter 6

Natural and unnatural aging

Why do political activists and the people choose different versions of the tradition? Some activists select the collective path-socialist ideology; others demand democracy, and then nationalism and fascism replace anarchy. That is why one brother selects socialism; as we found out, the younger brother breaks the queue, while the other, older one always supports evolution and observes the order.

No people can support democracy if there is no reason to do so. People who have lived in harsh conditions have always preached the principle of collectivism. One of these folks is the Russians. The same people live all over Eurasia. They didn’t create empires, but they tried. Before the Russian Empire, which became the USSR after the revolution, there was a Mongolian Golden Horde. It cannot be said that the Mongolian Genghis Khan was a socialist or a collectivist. He united the scattered nomadic tribes into one union. His soldiers and bureaucracy maintained a brutal order and discipline. In the Mongolian steppe, it was difficult for one person to survive. And all the Turks could not do without the help of their relatives. There was no socialism in the Horde, but the tasks of the state, the fate of the military empire, depended on general discipline. Here, the state and the empire are represented as one collective.

Ordinary people never know where prosperity comes from. With the general wildness, this is not allowed. Any head of a patriarchal family or a simple family finds it impossible to relax. Therefore, any empire is supported against disintegration by a cruel tyranny. The central government is the same patriarchal family but a large one. If there is no respect for the power of all members, the family empire disintegrates. The Horde, the empire, is a large patriarchal corporation. What problems each family had, and the tasks of each family in such unfavorable climatic conditions are always the same, the same tasks of the tyrant. If any tyrant decided to distribute a part of his wealth not to his children but to all the Horde people, all of them a little, someone would probably think of calling him a socialist. He would dismiss the thought immediately. And would have done the right thing. The Zerefs would have eaten this gift. Thanks. They wouldn’t have understood. And the Khan’s entourage would think that the ruler was mad.

But this is all a preface.

We must understand that socialism or the collective system is caused exclusively by collective values from common tasks. Many may not know where these national riches come from in living conditions. They don’t need to because knowing and reasoning are the traditional elite’s prerogatives. By the way, the presence of hierarchy and traditional discipline, caused, as described above, by the severity of the climate and the general patriarchal savagery, also says there is a condition here; there is ground only for socialism. And this wild socialism will necessarily be wild, cruel, and barbaric concerning the means to achieve the goal, as, indeed, all previous attempts to build an allied horde. This will be the same socialism that was established on the planet in the 20th century, and only this practice continues, and there can be no other. Karl Mark was wrong. But all socialists liked his words very much. And all the younger sons in strict patriarchal families liked it. After all, socialism took place precisely in the former empires, where there was strict discipline, a community, and a central tyranny, such power as the continuation of each petty tyranny in a separate family. In addition, all these younger ones broke the order. They were not supposed to inherit positions from the old government. The children of the feudal elite were to inherit the positions of the old government. But that is why technological progress is taking place, to disrupt the production of goods and the order of inheritance. It is flotagia, and flotagia we call the process of the influence of the new world and modernization on the Zerefs (the traditional world after processing by a new practice). As soon as the traditional people learned about the new system, the new socialism, they literally lost shame, forgot their turn in the queue for material goods, and therefore dropped caste. Only in a world of strict morals and defined order could this happen, only in the world of historical-cultural dictatorship. Karl Marx was not liked in a distributional and law-abiding Europe but in a wild and moral Asia, where informal laws, including the laws of a hierarchy, are always in force. “The proletariat has nothing to lose but chains, and it will gain the whole world” – and everyone will forget the old queue for the “inheritance”. After all, it is the inheritance that interests everyone. It is not a literal inheritance; some fathers simply have nothing to give to their sons of any age, but a symbolic inheritance as part of the general national product. You can get nothing at all to get your share in the old scheme. Everyone knew that. People of all ages understood this. The lower castes, the humiliated strata, the proletarians, and the peasants appeared as the younger sons. This, first. Secondly, to turn into a new feudal group, into modern oligarchs, in other words, these “younger” ones will need, as the practice has shown, three generations of feudal socialism. Does it turn out that? It turns out that the rebirth of all the younger sons can occur in an ordinary family. If nothing happens, the order is observed. Natural aging makes everyone law-abiding philistines.