Алмаз Браев – Kazakhs and Jews (страница 3)

Chapter 5

How to avoid war and slavery

For the Lord your God will bless you, as He has told you, and you will lend to many nations, but you won’t lend to your people

Deuteronomy 15:6

!Meanwhile, the path is indicated through which domination over the peoples will be established – «to lend to many peoples» (independently, you can give to one person or to the government at interest. The size of the receiving subject does not change the essence. After a while, both the person and the government will get into debt)

This is obvious, how such spirituality and commitment to one source determine the fate of a nation.

The very attitude of being chosen, «us or them» – we and other peoples in the spiritual world has been crucial for 3,000 years.

What to do with strangers?

All pagans – modern nationalists, fascists and pagans (including pagans before our era) – know (knew) perfectly well. Strangers were always treated badly. Literally and violently. Violence is a clear indicator of barbarism and lack of spirituality.

All pagans (including modern ones) have many gods. They worship – they perform ancestor worship rituals. Either – this is the most massive group of people now – worship the golden calf (that is, money). Even if several billion people go to Buddhist temples, churches, and mosques, this does not prevent them from thinking about money. Sorry, there is no communism yet. There was no Second Coming, and there was no kingdom of God. De jure, you can declare yourself a Christian, a Muslim, a Hindu, de facto behave like the same Jews who did not wait for Moses from Sinai.

It’s another matter when there is one G-d.

You can lend money to strangers at interest, but you can and should help your own people. Isn’t there a monotony here? Moreover, is there no chauvinism?

And how else to confirm your superiority?

It’s very simple – to lend money. Then harvest the «harvest». No violence – everything is voluntary.

The whole world today gives loans, loans, and tranches at interest. Who did modern bankers learn from? And who were the first bankers? Who wrote out the first bills? The whole world is obsessed with profit today. Are all people in the race for money? Who they all work for during the race madness. Who do all these stock exchanges work for?

It’s not hard to guess. All these bankers, industrialists, fund managers, brokers, and prime ministers have received interest in growth – they make a profit for themselves, and at the same time, they return it to whom? – to the original source. Everyone who takes out a loan or mortgage plays by the rules (to be more precise, according to the prescription of the most ancient spiritual monument.

Why are there no Christian banks in the world?

Why does the Pope bless all kinds of obscenities?

Why are almost all European politicians now clowns?

Because they depend on money, maybe they personally are not literally slaves of money, although it is doubtful – they are also evolutionarily derived, as in an incubator, of European bourgeois values. And who is the bourgeoisie’s god?

Are there any alternatives to this?

Islamic banks are practicing Islamic banking.

They do not give in to growth. After receiving the result, the result is divided into agreed parts. In case of failure, one Islamic bank loses money, the other side expended efforts. Full trust

Although Islamic banking currently represents a small percentage of global transactions, it is an obvious alternative to global paganism. Clown rulers have not yet been recorded in Islamic countries or even secular communities – states that do not practice fundamental Islam.

Chapter 6

Who do Kazakhs study with?

You can love yourself. You can love people. Jews are obviously the most ideological in this sense.

When the sages were looking for the Philosopher’s Stone, other revolutionaries constantly fought for freedom, equality, and justice; the Jews believed in themselves and their people. Or rather, they had exceptional faith. This cannot be called simple nationalism, which is known to the world relatively recently. How was it recently? Approximately, maybe 300 years. And the Jews had «nationalism» when no one yet knew what money, property, and the economy were (money has always been in human society, but not everyone). Because of the specific behavior because of the desire for isolation, many looked at Jews with suspicion. The Jews were locked up all the time, one might say, in their little world. More precisely, they gathered to perform a religious cult – others were jealously not allowed into this world. Do you want to marry Moisha’s daughter? Convert to Judaism – make a giyur. Keep the commandments of the Torah. And no more questions. In this sense, Jewish women have always been more zealous and submissive: they followed «don’t marry them» more strongly than men. (Well, they couldn’t, especially after the Babylonian captivity. Moreover, the priest Ezra ordered all Jews to divorce those who had got the «wrong» wife or the wrong husband in 70 years. And after all, everything was fulfilled. In order not to dissolve or disappear among other nations. But that was before our era. However, then, everything was repeated. Jews were being chased. Jews were oppressed. A lot has changed. But the fundamentals have remained the same. Today, the times are liberal, it seems, if we are talking about marriages. That is not the point. There is even an opinion that the USSR was destroyed, too, on purpose because there were many mixed marriages. What nonsense! We know that the USSR collapsed independently – see my book «Tradition Against Communism.» When the Russian Revolution took place in 1917, who was accused? No secrets, no Jews. When Russia became a democracy, who did it? Why are there solid oligarchs and bankers …There’s something wrong here. The oligarch Berezovsky said that Jews are more adapted to everything. What is, is. They are always ahead. Who are all newspaper editors in our area? Yes, what is there in the region – all over Kazakhstan. First, this is the so-called tabloid press, which provides a quick and guaranteed income. Could any Kazakh have guessed about the income? Could any Kazakh write about all sorts of «obscenities» – topics that ordinary people read? No, it’s not. The Kazakh will say: «Uyat.» Like, «It’s a shame.» Once, Mingrel Loria, provincial editor, told me: «If I print your philosophical opuses, my newspaper will have fifty readers.» And he’s right, unfortunately. Jews are immune, on the contrary, as it were. They know people. They know what people want. And Kazakhs are always interested in fame and honor – some kind of position. The Kazakhs hired editors to create an «illumination» of Kazakh democracy – the Kazakh showcase. Thirty years of independence have passed. And who are the editors? They’ve grown quite old. But they continue to depict full news counters for the Kazakhs. No, it’s not just Jews there. There are few Jews among the Kazakhs at all – this happened according to history. Basically, during the Great Patriotic War, intellectuals of all kinds moved from the western regions of the USSR to Tashkent and Alma-Ata, including professors, artists, and engineers. I looked at the teaching staff of the Aktobe Medical Institute when the first streams of Kazakh doctors were being prepared (my parents received diplomas in the first stream). Today, their children work well in human rights protection, first of all. In business, it’s kind of just supposed to be. Legal protection is always on the side of business.

Moreover, even if the very first human rights defender stumbled, all Kazakhstani human rights defenders and, of course, international human rights protection actively stood up for him (no Kazakh dreamed of such protection, especially his small educational newspaper «Bak», «bak» in Kazakh is happiness, short for «bakyt». When it was closed, no one noticed, no one said anything. Except for my late comrade in the opposition, Andrei Klimonov. Because officials and rich Kazakhs, and indeed all Kazakhs, «rights and freedoms» are not in the first place. Officials and the new rich want more money, and ordinary Kazakhs want to compete or are busy looking for daily bread).

Interestingly, all Jews used to be socialists, advocating equality and justice. Today, everyone is liberal. For human rights, for freedom. I will say that for a Kazakh and a Jew, freedom is something completely different (Kazakhs are paternal; they can lose everything if they are free). But the Kazakhs, again, as if they got into the first year and got excellent marks from the teachers. The Elbasy of the first one has already been replaced by the second president after thirty years of rule, and only liberals are on the air. Not Jews, and not Russians, but Kazakhs. These Democrats of the first wave have suffered a complete defeat and must sink through the ground, but again and again, the same faces. Kazakhs are liberals, piece pensioners + plus urban burghers from NGOs, which means that they receive money from the West for their views (bla- bla- bla), and they run ahead of the locomotive. We are liberals! We are Democrats! We are the best students! It looks somewhat comical. It causes nothing but irony. Everyone knows that money rules the whole world. But we want to demonstrate something. What do they say? A Kazakh without show-offs is a non-showy Kazakh. (This does not mean that «nagyz» Kazakh should be engaged exclusively in the glorification of ancestors).